Source Register — AI Ethics in Education
600 words
Source Register — AI Ethics in Education
Distilled from course pack Appendix B. Restricted set: nothing outside this register is cited anywhere in the course. Per-session mapping matches syllabus §4.
Primary — Stanford HAI
MIT — AI & Education Report
| Source |
Used in |
MIT Ad Hoc Committee on AI in Education, Final Report (Aug 2026) — aiandeducation.mit.edu/report/ — 8 principles, 30 sub-recommendations. Full report PDF in reports/MIT-AI-Committee-Final-Report.pdf |
S1 (recommended reading), S2 (apprenticeship-displacement Card 9), S5 (grading-system provocation), S6 (guideline component 6, instructor disclosure, mirror-test; evidence base for components 4b and 8) |
Primary — Stanford HAI
| Source |
Used in |
| 2026 AI Index Report, esp. Education chapter — hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report |
S1 (data walk), S3 (adoption), S6 (policy-clarity stat) |
| HAI Education programs & mission — hai.stanford.edu/education |
S1, S2 (human-centered framing) |
| "AI-Detectors Biased Against Non-Native English Writers" (HAI News) |
S3 |
| "AI's 'Delusional Spirals'…" (HAI News, Apr 2026) |
S2 (wellbeing risk) |
Stanford research
| Source |
Used in |
| Liang, Yuksekgonul, Mao, Wu & Zou (2023), Patterns 4(7), DOI 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779 — detector bias vs non-native writers |
S3 evidentiary core; cited inside Guideline v0.1 (S7) |
| Wang, Demszky et al. (2024), Tutor CoPilot (arXiv/working paper) |
S1 (opportunity ledger) |
Ivy League / top-tier
| Source |
Used in |
| Bastani et al. (2025), PNAS 122(26), DOI 10.1073/pnas.2422633122 — crutch-effect RCT |
S5 core; previewed S2 |
| Mollick & Mollick (2023), "Assigning AI" (SSRN) — seven roles |
S5 |
| Kosmyna et al. (MIT Media Lab, 2025), "Your Brain on ChatGPT" (arXiv preprint, N=54 — always cite with limitations) |
S2 (cognitive risk), S5 (discernment contrast vs RCT) |
| Floridi et al. (2018), "AI4People," Minds and Machines — five principles |
S2 |
| Wan et al. (2023), reference-letter gender bias, EMNLP Findings |
S2 (P03 demo grounding) |
| Harvard CS50 AI tutor (Malan et al., SIGCSE) |
S1, S3 |
| Stanford / Harvard / MIT generative-AI teaching guidance pages — devolved-but-scaffolded shape |
S6 |
Frontier lab — Anthropic
| Source |
Used in |
| AI Fluency Framework (Dakan, Feller & Anthropic, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) — aifluencyframework.org |
S4 spine; optional pre-work (S1) |
| Anthropic Education Report: How University Students Use Claude (Apr 2025) |
S1, S2, S3 (usage + misuse patterns) |
| Anthropic faculty-usage education report (Aug 2025, ~74k conversations) |
S4 |
Local statutory / regulatory (structural, not "cited")
| Source |
Used in |
| Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (Malaysia) |
S2 (privacy risk), S4 (lab rule), S6–S7 (guideline component 6) |
NAIO AI Governance Bill consultation fact sheets (AI_Governance_Bill_Fact_Sheet.md, this folder; distilled in malaysia-ai-governance-note.md) |
S6–S7 (five principles crosswalk, three-tier risk framework, Central Authority pattern) |
[LOCAL] slots: MQA programme standards, MOHE guidance, institutional senate |
S6–S7, filled by guideline owner |
Case dossiers to compile (sources/cases/)
| Case |
Opens |
Status |
| UK Ofqual 2020 grading algorithm (39% downgraded; U-turn) |
S2 (case-first opening) |
☑ cases/ofqual-2020.md |
| St George's Hospital Medical School admissions screening (1980s) |
S2 (historical anchor) |
☑ cases/st-georges-1980s.md |
| Texas A&M–Commerce ChatGPT false-accusation (May 2023) |
S3 (case-first opening) |
☑ cases/texas-am-commerce-2023.md |
Framework lineage (disclosed, not cited)
- EAI-CMM adapts the SSA-CMM maturity-ladder pattern (The Future Is Solo).
- 4D competency spine adapts the AI Fluency Framework (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — remix rights disclosed to participants in S4).