# Capstone Brief — Institutional AI-Use Guideline v0.1
*Handed out in Session 1. This is the destination; everything in the course feeds it.*

## What you will leave with
By Wednesday morning your team ships a **draft institutional AI-use guideline (v0.1)** for your department or faculty:

- **≤ 2 pages.** Length is a bug. If it can't be taught to first-years in ten minutes, it won't govern anything.
- **Nine components (7 required + 2 optional):** scope & definitions · principles · permission architecture (three lanes) · disclosure standard · instructor AI-use disclosure (4b, new) · integrity procedure · data & privacy rules + platform governance (PDPA-mapped) · ownership & review + monitoring metrics · roles, infrastructure & funding (Component 8, optional).
- **Version block on page one:** v0.1 · named owner · review date ≤ 12 months out.
- **Red-team tested:** attacked by another team in four personas; top three findings patched; the rest logged in a v0.2 backlog.
- **Its own AI-use disclosure at the foot.** A policy about AI transparency that hides its own AI use is dead on arrival.

Plus a **personal 7/30/90-day action plan** with a named ally, dates, and a kill criterion ("I will know this failed if ___ by ___").

## How each session feeds it
| Session | You produce | It becomes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | EAI-CMM baseline · Threat/Gift matrix | Your measured starting point · the risk/opportunity inventory the guideline must answer |
| 2 | Ethics triage rankings · case memo | The principles component · severity logic for the integrity procedure |
| 3 | Disclosure template · detector position | Components 4 & 5, with the *Patterns* citation attached |
| 4 | Verification log · two working workflows | The staff-diligence norm — staff disclose too |
| 5 | Redesign sheet · tutor prompt · policy paragraph | The permission architecture · course-level layer of the policy |
| 6 | Maturity scan · gap analysis · mirror test · drafting brief | The build spec, with instructor-disclosure symmetry and infrastructure requirements. **No brief, no draft.** |
| 7 | **Guideline v0.1** · EAI-CMM delta · action plan | The capstone, shipped |

## Portfolio (six artifacts, kept by you)
1. EAI-CMM baseline + retake with delta
2. Verification log (≥3 rows per workflow)
3. Assessment redesign sheet
4. Guardrailed-tutor prompt + break-test note
5. Guideline v0.1 with red-team backlog
6. 7/30/90 action plan with kill criterion

## Assessment
Formative throughout (nothing graded before S7). Session 8 (Thursday 3 Sep · 11.00 am–1.00 noon): present artifacts 5–6 against the summative rubric (five criteria, max 20; pass ≥ 12, distinction ≥ 17; one "Ship It" award for the plan the panel would fund tomorrow).

## Ground rules
- Bring **one real course** (syllabus + assessments). No hypotheticals — every artifact must be deployable the Monday after.
- Teams of 4–5, mixed discipline, fixed for all three days. Your table is your drafting team.
- Working account on at least one frontier AI assistant, verified at check-in.

*Axiom A7: policy is a product. Perfect is what institutions say while shipping nothing. We ship v0.1.*