TFIS · AI Ethics in Education · Course

Developing Institutional
Guidelines — Part 2

Ethical AI Use in Teaching and Learning · Ship

Session 7 · Thursday 3 September 2026 · 8.30–10.30 am

Pure production sprint + adversarial review + measurementOutput: Guideline v0.1 · EAI-CMM delta · action plan

Sprint rules · 0:00

SAY "Forty-five minutes, seven components, two pages maximum, version number and review date on page one. You may use AI heavily — this is a 🟢 lane task — under the discipline you built Tuesday: describe with full context, discern every clause, disclose at the bottom. Your guideline will carry its own AI-use statement. A policy about AI transparency that hides its own AI use is dead on arrival. Mula."
Drafting sprint · 45 min · teams · P13

Hard constraints

  • ≤ 2 pages
  • Three-lane vocabulary used
  • Detector-evidence status explicit — with the Patterns citation
  • PDPA clause present
  • [LOCAL] slots marked, owner named
  • AI-use disclosure statement at the foot
  • Feed P13 your gap analysis, default rule, and S5 policy paragraphs — personal practice becomes institutional text

Facilitator circulates with three interventions only: "Which component is that?" · "Can a first-year act on this sentence?" · "Where's your review date?"

Red-team exchange · 25 min · P14

Swap drafts. Attack in four personas.

PersonaHunting for
1 · The laundering studentWhere does this policy leave me a legal-looking cheat path?
2 · The overworked lecturerWhich clause will I ignore because compliance costs more than violation?
3 · The falsely accusedDoes the integrity procedure protect me — or just the institution?
4 · The auditorWhich claim has no owner, no evidence standard, or no review mechanism?

Findings as written bullets, severity-ranked — no oral debate. Drafters defend in patches, not speeches.

Patch round · 15 min

Fix three. Log the rest.

SAY "A guideline nobody attacked is a guideline nobody read. You have just been read more carefully than most national policies ever are."
EAI-CMM retake · 10 min · same honesty guard

Measure the delta

SAY "Your delta is real but bounded — you moved because you made things. The route card for your next level is in your pack. It works the same way: artifacts, not intentions."
Action plan skeleton · 15 min · individual · P15

7 · 30 · 90

HorizonCommitment
7 daysDeploy one S4 workflow in a live course. Already built — deployment is the only step left.
30 daysRun the redesigned assessment with one real cohort; collect the process evidence it was designed to produce.
90 daysMove Guideline v0.1 one institutional step — department meeting, faculty committee, or senate paper — with a named ally and a date.
Kill criterion"I will know this failed if ___ by ___." Mandatory. Plans without falsifiability are wishes.

Summative portfolio · complete

Six artifacts. Three days.

Session 8 presents artifacts 5–6 against the summative rubric: pass ≥12 · distinction ≥17 · one "Ship It" award.

Contrarian close · the last axiom

SAY "The scarce resource in AI ethics is not principles — the world has published hundreds of frameworks. It is not even evidence — Stanford hands you a fresh Index every April. The scarce resource is institutional metabolism: the ability to convert evidence into shipped, versioned, owned practice faster than the capability curve moves. Three days ago that gap was the curriculum. This morning, for your institution, you became the gap-closing mechanism. Version 0.1 is in your hands. Session 8: show us. Then go ship."
Session 8 · Action Plan Presentations · 7 min eachTerima kasih — pergi hantar

Appendix · facilitator only

Notes